
#MetaSourcing: The Sourcing That Begins Before the Sourcing
March 9, 2021 · SourceCon Digital ·
Speakers
About this video
Sourcing does not start on LinkedIn. It starts with the research and calibration work that happens before a single search string gets typed, and most of that groundwork gets skipped or done badly. A framework for fixing that begins with killing the standard intake call.
Instead of a rambling forty-five minute call, hiring managers fill out a written intake form covering benchmark candidates, a link to the job description, and the real reason someone would want to join the team, not generic lines about benefits or culture. That form replaces most of the conversation. What replaces the rest is a short pre-calibration: a ten-minute session where the hiring manager reacts to three or four real candidate profiles, giving concrete signal on what they actually respond to.
Once that intake is done, the real pre-search begins. This covers:
- Pulling accurate job titles from external sources rather than guessing, since a quick search of common title lists for a function often surfaces terms a recruiter would never think to use
- Identifying LinkedIn's stop words, terms like "Go" or "with" that get silently dropped from Boolean searches even inside quotation marks, and finding workarounds, such as searching for named technologies or frameworks instead of a language name that won't register
- Using Wikipedia and similar reference pages to find lists of tools, applications, or competitors tied to a technology or industry
- Scraping those lists with a browser tool rather than transcribing them by hand, using an advanced element-selection method to pull structured data straight off a webpage
- Turning scraped lists into Boolean strings instead of manually typing out long "or" chains of company or technology names
- Saving finished Boolean strings and full search strings for reuse on future searches, rather than rebuilding them from scratch each time
The larger point is a shift in where a recruiter's time goes: less of it spent on calls repeating information that could have been written down, more of it spent building a base of research and reusable search assets that make every candidate conversation sharper.
